E-learning in Usa as a developing Country: Issues Ahead and Possible Alternatives

 E-learning in Iran being a developing Country: Challenges In advance and Likely Solutions Composition

ISSN 2278-7690

E-learning in Iran being a developing Region: Challenges Ahead and Likely Solutions

Mas`oud Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, Massoud Yaghoubi-Notash (PhD) University of Teheran, Teachers of International Languages and Literatures, Teheran, Iran

masoud. [email protected] com

University of Tabriz, English language Department, Faculty of Persian Literature & Foreign 'languages', Tabriz, Iran

masoud. [email protected] com


E-learning features lately grown into a growing area due to its good potentials for instructional and analysis purposes. Framework of teaching where e-learning is entrusted can keep implications to get the range and cases of application. The modern day study details the major problems faced to that end by Iranian practitioners and also offer a few practical solutions to these challenges. As a descriptive study in nature, the information population made up 350 Iranian citizens via various cultural, economical and academic backgrounds outdated between of sixteen and 53 who were asked to prioritize six key challenges Iranian people deal with regarding the e-learning arena on a standardized Likert-type scale. The challenges had been selected by among those earlier reported in the related literature. 6 major challenges to be prioritized were: insufficient government support, lack of general public awareness, expense of e-learning, collectivist culture of Iran, low-speed internet, internal filtering and external sanctions. The results suggested that insufficient public understanding, lack of authorities support and collectivist society of Serbia were chosen by the individuals as the primary hurdles in the path of e-learning expansion in Usa, respectively. Further more solutions and implications of the study are discussed inside the study.

Indexing terms/Key terms:

E-learning, Problems in E-learning, E-learning in Iran

Educational Discipline and Sub-Disciplines

Education, educational technology

Subject Category


Council for Impressive Research

Expert Review Research Publishing Program


www.ijrem.com, [email protected] com

788 | G a g e

July 25, 2014

ISSN 2278-7690


Not many aspects, if, of our modern-day routines manage to have remained uninfluenced by computer, the twentieth hundred years wonder equipment. Irresistible and hard to escape as they may possibly appear, these kinds of sweeping improvements have also guaranteed new potentials for several fields and activities which includes education. E-learning as a rapidly growing, if not to say a volatile, field will offer a wide range of potentials for analysis and practice (Fryer, Bovee, & Nakao, 2014). Therefore elearning may possibly bear a good deal of potentials intended for instructional theorizing, research and practice (see Warshauer & Liau, 2010 for instance).

E-learning can easily denote the use of electronic devices in education. Rosenberg (2001) limitations e-learning to the use of online learning via World Internet as " the use of net technologies to offer a broad assortment of solutions that enhance know-how and performance... [which] is based upon three critical criteria: network, delivered and focus on the broadest view of learning” (p. 28). Nevertheless, only some characterizations of e-learning happen to be confined to that scope. Additional definitions grow the realm of e-learning beyond the net to embrace the computer alone. Generally speaking, elearning can consider distant electric learning depending upon a wide group of applications and processes, just like 









employing internet websites and computers,

having virtual classes

delivery info via internet,

intranet/extranet networks,

audio- and videotapes,

satellite broadcasting,

online televisions,


tablets and smart phones.

In the early days, e-learning was not extremely warmly welcomed, as many people thought bringing computers and also other voluminous electronic devices into the classroom...

References: Adrich, C. 2005. Simulations plus the Future of Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Albirini, A. 2006. Teachers‟ attitudes toward information and communication solutions: the case of Syrian EFL


Andersson, A. and Gronlund, A. 2009. A conceptual platform for e-learning in producing countries: A crucial

review of research challenges

Arsham, H. 2002. Impact in the internet about learning and teaching, Diary of the United States Distance education


Arsham, H. 2010. Interactive education: impact of the Internet upon learning and teaching. Gathered October 2013

from http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/interactive.htm

Bates, A. 2005. Technology, e-learning and distance education. London. Rutledge.

Claudia, M., Steil, A., and Todesco, J. 2004. Factors influencing the adoption of the net as a instructing tool in

foreign language universities

De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., and Temperini, Meters. 2013. A means to00 join adaptive and reputation-based socialcollaborative e-learning, through the sector of proximal development. Intercontinental Journal of Distance Education

Technologies (IJDET)

Garrison, Deb. R. 97. Self-directed learning: toward a comprehensive model. Mature Education Quarterly, 48, 1618.

10. Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. Deb., and Wideman, H. H. 2002. Factors contributing to

teachers‟ successful execution of IT

10. Henry, Meters. and Abala, A. 2009. E-learning research methods and approaches. Process of the initial Kuwait

Conference on E-Services and E-Systems, Nov

14. Hunt, M. C., Jr. 1997. The result of Self-Selection, Interest, and Motivation after

frustrational amounts

16. Kousha, K. 2004. Iran 's national ICT education strategy: an overview with the possibilities, challenges and the programs.

17. Knowles, M. T. 1975. Self-directed learning: helpful tips for learners and instructors, Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs,

New Jersey.

18. Laurillard, Deb. 1995. Multimedia system and the changing experience of the learner. United kingdom Journal of Educational


19. Liaw, S. H. 2002. A web survey pertaining to perceptions of computer and World Wide Web: romance, prediction,

and difference

twenty. Liaw, S. S. (2004). Considerations pertaining to developing constructivist Web-based learning. International Record of

Instructional Media

21 years old. Lubis, M. A., H. R. Ariffin, T. A. Muhamad, Meters. S. Ibrahim andI. H. Wekke. 2009. The integration of ICT in the

teaching and learning procedures: A study upon smart institution of Malaysia

22. Muir-Herzig, R. G. 2004. Technology and its influence in the classroom. Computers and Education. 42, 111–131.

794 | P a g elizabeth

July 25, 2014

twenty-five. Rabiee, A. Nazarian, Z .. Gharibshaeian, R. 2013. An Explanation for Net Use Obstacles Concerning Elearning in Serbia. International Report on Research in Open and Distance Learning 13, 361-377.

dua puluh enam. Rosenberg, Meters. 2001. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge inside the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

27. Rossett, A. and Sheldon, K. 2001. Beyond The Podium: Delivering Training and satisfaction to aDigital

World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

28. Rudenstam, To., A. 2012. Individualism or collectivism. Recovered 2014, January 29, coming from


twenty nine. Saba, and Shearer, Ur. 1994. Verifying key assumptive concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The

American Journal of Distance Education

30. Tabatabaei, M. 2010. Evolution of distance education in Usa, Procedia, two, 1043–1047.

31. Tavangarian G., Leypold Meters., Nölting E., Röser Meters., 2004. Is usually e-learning the answer for Individual Learning?

Journal of e-learning, two, 273-280.

32. Umrani-Khan, Farreneheit. and Iyer, S. 2009. ELAM: A model foracceptance and use of e-learning by professors


thirty-three. Wang, Con. S. 2003. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information

andManagement, forty one, 75–86.

34. Yaghoubi, M. Malek Mohammadi, I. Attaran, M. Iravani, and Gheidi, H. 08. Virtual students‟ perception of elearning in Iran. The Turkish On-line Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 159-173.

35. Passerini, K., and Granger, Meters. J. 2000. A expansion model for distance learning online. Computers

and Education