E-learning in Usa as a developing Country: Issues Ahead and Possible Alternatives
E-learning in Iran being a developing Region: Challenges Ahead and Likely Solutions
Mas`oud Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, Massoud Yaghoubi-Notash (PhD) University of Teheran, Teachers of International Languages and Literatures, Teheran, Iran
masoud. [email protected] com
University of Tabriz, English language Department, Faculty of Persian Literature & Foreign 'languages', Tabriz, Iran
masoud. [email protected] com
E-learning features lately grown into a growing area due to its good potentials for instructional and analysis purposes. Framework of teaching where e-learning is entrusted can keep implications to get the range and cases of application. The modern day study details the major problems faced to that end by Iranian practitioners and also offer a few practical solutions to these challenges. As a descriptive study in nature, the information population made up 350 Iranian citizens via various cultural, economical and academic backgrounds outdated between of sixteen and 53 who were asked to prioritize six key challenges Iranian people deal with regarding the e-learning arena on a standardized Likert-type scale. The challenges had been selected by among those earlier reported in the related literature. 6 major challenges to be prioritized were: insufficient government support, lack of general public awareness, expense of e-learning, collectivist culture of Iran, low-speed internet, internal filtering and external sanctions. The results suggested that insufficient public understanding, lack of authorities support and collectivist society of Serbia were chosen by the individuals as the primary hurdles in the path of e-learning expansion in Usa, respectively. Further more solutions and implications of the study are discussed inside the study.
Indexing terms/Key terms:
E-learning, Problems in E-learning, E-learning in Iran
Educational Discipline and Sub-Disciplines
Education, educational technology
Council for Impressive Research
Expert Review Research Publishing Program
Journal: WORLDWIDE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION METHODOLOGY Vol 6, No . a couple of
www.ijrem.com, [email protected] com
788 | G a g e
July 25, 2014
Not many aspects, if, of our modern-day routines manage to have remained uninfluenced by computer, the twentieth hundred years wonder equipment. Irresistible and hard to escape as they may possibly appear, these kinds of sweeping improvements have also guaranteed new potentials for several fields and activities which includes education. E-learning as a rapidly growing, if not to say a volatile, field will offer a wide range of potentials for analysis and practice (Fryer, Bovee, & Nakao, 2014). Therefore elearning may possibly bear a good deal of potentials intended for instructional theorizing, research and practice (see Warshauer & Liau, 2010 for instance).
E-learning can easily denote the use of electronic devices in education. Rosenberg (2001) limitations e-learning to the use of online learning via World Internet as " the use of net technologies to offer a broad assortment of solutions that enhance know-how and performance... [which] is based upon three critical criteria: network, delivered and focus on the broadest view of learningвЂќ (p. 28). Nevertheless, only some characterizations of e-learning happen to be confined to that scope. Additional definitions grow the realm of e-learning beyond the net to embrace the computer alone. Generally speaking, elearning can consider distant electric learning depending upon a wide group of applications and processes, just like п‚·
employing internet websites and computers,
having virtual classes
delivery info via internet,
audio- and videotapes,
CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, and
tablets and smart phones.
In the early days, e-learning was not extremely warmly welcomed, as many people thought bringing computers and also other voluminous electronic devices into the classroom...
References: Adrich, C. 2005. Simulations plus the Future of Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Albirini, A. 2006. TeachersвЂџ attitudes toward information and communication solutions: the case of Syrian EFL
Andersson, A. and Gronlund, A. 2009. A conceptual platform for e-learning in producing countries: A crucial
review of research challenges
Arsham, H. 2002. Impact in the internet about learning and teaching, Diary of the United States Distance education
Arsham, H. 2010. Interactive education: impact of the Internet upon learning and teaching. Gathered October 2013
Bates, A. 2005. Technology, e-learning and distance education. London. Rutledge.
Claudia, M., Steil, A., and Todesco, J. 2004. Factors influencing the adoption of the net as a instructing tool in
foreign language universities
De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., and Temperini, Meters. 2013. A means to00 join adaptive and reputation-based socialcollaborative e-learning, through the sector of proximal development. Intercontinental Journal of Distance Education
Garrison, Deb. R. 97. Self-directed learning: toward a comprehensive model. Mature Education Quarterly, 48, 1618.
10. Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. Deb., and Wideman, H. H. 2002. Factors contributing to
teachersвЂџ successful execution of IT
10. Henry, Meters. and Abala, A. 2009. E-learning research methods and approaches. Process of the initial Kuwait
Conference on E-Services and E-Systems, Nov
14. Hunt, M. C., Jr. 1997. The result of Self-Selection, Interest, and Motivation after
16. Kousha, K. 2004. Iran 's national ICT education strategy: an overview with the possibilities, challenges and the programs.
17. Knowles, M. T. 1975. Self-directed learning: helpful tips for learners and instructors, Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs,
18. Laurillard, Deb. 1995. Multimedia system and the changing experience of the learner. United kingdom Journal of Educational
19. Liaw, S. H. 2002. A web survey pertaining to perceptions of computer and World Wide Web: romance, prediction,
twenty. Liaw, S. S. (2004). Considerations pertaining to developing constructivist Web-based learning. International Record of
21 years old. Lubis, M. A., H. R. Ariffin, T. A. Muhamad, Meters. S. Ibrahim andI. H. Wekke. 2009. The integration of ICT in the
teaching and learning procedures: A study upon smart institution of Malaysia
22. Muir-Herzig, R. G. 2004. Technology and its influence in the classroom. Computers and Education. 42, 111вЂ“131.
794 | P a g elizabeth
July 25, 2014
twenty-five. Rabiee, A. Nazarian, Z .. Gharibshaeian, R. 2013. An Explanation for Net Use Obstacles Concerning Elearning in Serbia. International Report on Research in Open and Distance Learning 13, 361-377.
dua puluh enam. Rosenberg, Meters. 2001. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge inside the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Rossett, A. and Sheldon, K. 2001. Beyond The Podium: Delivering Training and satisfaction to aDigital
World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
28. Rudenstam, To., A. 2012. Individualism or collectivism. Recovered 2014, January 29, coming from
twenty nine. Saba, and Shearer, Ur. 1994. Verifying key assumptive concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The
American Journal of Distance Education
30. Tabatabaei, M. 2010. Evolution of distance education in Usa, Procedia, two, 1043вЂ“1047.
31. Tavangarian G., Leypold Meters., NГ¶lting E., RГ¶ser Meters., 2004. Is usually e-learning the answer for Individual Learning?
Journal of e-learning, two, 273-280.
32. Umrani-Khan, Farreneheit. and Iyer, S. 2009. ELAM: A model foracceptance and use of e-learning by professors
thirty-three. Wang, Con. S. 2003. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information
andManagement, forty one, 75вЂ“86.
34. Yaghoubi, M. Malek Mohammadi, I. Attaran, M. Iravani, and Gheidi, H. 08. Virtual studentsвЂџ perception of elearning in Iran. The Turkish On-line Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 159-173.
35. Passerini, K., and Granger, Meters. J. 2000. A expansion model for distance learning online. Computers