Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management

 Humanitarian Strategies and Supply String Management Essay

Dublin Company of Technology

[email protected]

Content School of Management


(Le)agility in Humanitarian Help Supply Restaurants

Kirstin Scholten

Dublin Commence of Technology, [email protected] com

Pamela Sharkey Scott

Dublin Institute of Technology

Brian Fynes

Smurfit School of Business, College or university College Dublin

Recommended Quotation

Scholten, K., Sharkey Scott, P., Fynes, B. Le)agility in humanitarian aid (NGO) supply Worldwide Journal of Physical Distribution & Strategies Management Volume level: 40 Issue: 8/9 2010

This Article is presented for free and open get by the Institution of Management at [email protected] It has been acknowledged for introduction in Articles or blog posts by an authorized administrator of [email protected] For more information, please get in touch with yvonne. [email protected] ie.

(Le)Agility in Education Aid Source Chains

Kirstin Scholten and Pamela Sharkey Scott Teachers of Business, Dublin Company of Technology, Dublin, Ireland in europe, and Brian Fynes Smurfit School of Business, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract Goal - This paper is exploring the concept of flexibility in the circumstance of source chains of humanitarian help (HA) businesses, particularly Not Government Companies (NGOs). This kind of responds towards the increasing pressure on NGOs to use their particular resources even more strategically if they happen to be to gain donor trust and long term dedication.

Design/ Methodology/Approach - A literature centered approach that extends the commercial supply chain idea of agility to NGOs is definitely combined with the first exploratory partial structured interviews of these concepts with five NGO supply chain company directors.

Findings – The business concept of flexibility when answering disaster alleviation holds strong potential for raising efficiency and effectiveness, yet this app is controlled by the a shortage of supporting Information Technology (IT) as well as the relegation of supply cycle management (SCM) to the ‘back office' by NGOs. It has potential implications for NGOs and other humanitarian aid agencies.

Research Constraints - This kind of paper symbolizes an educational study, and an extended pool of interviewees would enhance the qualitative findings. Prepared future study will address this issue.

Practical Implications - Practical assistance with how NGOs can proactively manage their very own organization's capacity to respond with agility in a highly pressured environment is definitely provided.

Appearance - This kind of paper is definitely the first to provide practical guidance to managers of NGOs on tactics available to boost their organization's flexibility and flexibility, based on assumptive concepts and initial disovery data. In addition , evidence of just how commercial equipment apply in a different industry may immediate commercial managers to be even more innovative in utilizing and customizing source chain guidelines to their particular context of operation.

Keywords – Supply Chain Supervision, Agility, Leagility, NGO Paper type – Research Daily news


Contributor increasingly require accountability, visibility and affordability in return for all their sponsorship of Humanitarian Help (HA) organizations. Meeting these kinds of more challenging efficiency and responsibility standards requires HA companies to be even more professional inside their approach to taking care of their functions (Thomas and Kopczak, 2005). As 80% of ANORDNA operations include SCM actions (Van Wassenhove, 2006), the use of commercial SCM techniques may well at least partially talk about this problem. Yet , to date ST?LLA TILL MED ETT agencies carry on and rely on criteria used in the for-profit sector in the 1970s and 80s (Fenton, 2003, Rickard, 2003) and largely disregard emerging techniques developed to aid businesses reply to an increasingly difficult environment. Via a theoretical perspective the use of SCM principles to ANORDNA has been largely overlooked, inspite of the stakes and size of the aid industry and the elevating flow of HA money to the producing world (Beamon and Balcik, 2008)- Discover Figure 1 ) This is...

Sources: AGARWAL, A., SHANKAR, 3rd there’s r. & TIWARI, M. T. (2006) Building the metrics of trim, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Diary of Operational Research, 173, 221225. AITKEN, J., CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER, M. & TOWILL, G. (2002) Understanding, implementing and exploiting flexibility and leanness. International Record of Logistics, 5, 59-74. BEAMON, N. M. & BALCIK, B. (2008) Performance measurement in humanitarian alleviation chains. Foreign Journal of Public Sector Management, thirty-one, 4-25.

on the lookout for

CHILDERHOUSE, S. & TOWILL, D. (2000) Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements. Logistics Details Management, 13, 337-345. CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER, M. & TOWILL, M. R. (2000) Supply cycle migration by lean and functional to agile and customized. Supply Chain Managing: An International Record, 5, 206-213. FENTON, G. (2003) Skill in the wonderful lakes. Compelled Migration Review, 18, 23-24. FISHER, M. L. (1997) What Is the ideal Supply String for Your Item? Harvard Business Review, seventy five, 105-116. ISMAIL, H. S. & SHARIFI, H. (2006) A balanced method to building acuto supply restaurants. International Record of Physical Distribution & Logistics Supervision, 36, 431-444. KOVГЃCS, G. & SPENS, K. Meters. (2007) Education logistics in disaster pain relief operations. Foreign Journal of Physical Syndication & Strategies Management, thirty seven, 99-114. LIN, C. -T., CHIU, L. & CHU, P. -Y. (2006) Flexibility index in the supply sequence. International Log of Creation Economics, 100, 285-299. LENGTHY, D. C. & REAL WOOD, D. N. (1995) The logistics of famine alleviation. Journal of Business Logistics, 16, 213229. MANUJ, I actually. & MENTZER, J. Capital t. (2008) Global supply chain risk management tactics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 192-223. MASON-JONES, L., NAYLOR, M. B. & TOWILL, Deb. (2000) Lean, agile or leagile? Coordinating your source chain towards the marketplace. Worldwide Journal of Production Exploration, 38, 4061-4070. MILES, M. B. & HUBERMAN, Meters. A. (1994) Qualitative Info Analysis, Birmingham, Saga Journals. NAGEL, L. & OVE, R. (1991) 21st Century Production Enterprise Technique, Lehigh College or university, Iacocca Start. NARASIMHAN, Ur., SWINK, M. & BETTY, S. Watts. (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical exploration. Journal of Operations Administration, 24, 440-457. OLORUNTOBA, L. & OFF WHITE, R. (2006) Humanitarian help: an snello supply cycle? Supply Cycle Management: An International Journal, eleven, 115-120. OLORUNTOBA, R. & GREY, Ur. (2009) Customer care in urgent relief restaurants International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Supervision, 39, 486-505. ORGANIZATION TO GET ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, O. Electronic. C. D. (2010) Money to the creation world [online]. Sold at: www. [Accessed: 02 March 2010]. PERRY, M. (2007) Natural disaster management planning: Research of strategies managers answering the tsunami. International Diary of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37, 409-433. PETTIT, S i9000. J. & BERESFORD, A. K. C. (2005) Emergency relief logistics: an evaluation of military, non-military and amalgamated response types. International Diary of Strategies: Research & Applications, eight, 313-331. PETTIT, S. T. & BERESFORD, A. K. C. (2009) Critical success factors inside the context of humanitarian aid supply organizations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Supervision, 39, 450-468. POWER, Deb., SOHAL, A. & RAHMAN, S. (2001) Critical accomplishment factors in agile supply chain management. International Diary of Physical Distribution and Logistics, 31, 247-265. RICKARD, J. (2003) A logistician 's plea. Forced Immigration Review, 18, 9. ROH, S., PETTIT, S. T. & BERESFORD, A. K. C. (2008) Humanitarian help logistics: response depot networks. Abstract Actions of the NOFOMA Conference. Helsinki. SANCHEZ, Ur. (1995) Ideal flexibility in product competition. Strategic Administration Journal, 18, 135-159. STEVENSON, M. & SPRING, Meters. (2007) Overall flexibility from a supply chain perspective: classification and review. International Journal of Procedures & Production Management, twenty seven, 685-713. THOMAS, A. T. (2003) How come logistics? Pressured Migration Review, 18, some.


THOMAS, A. H. & KOPCZAK, L. L. (2005) By logistics to offer chain supervision: the path forward in the education sector. Fritz Institute [Online]. Offered at: [Accessed: 18 November 2009]. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS, O. C. H. A. (2010) Haiti: Largest at any time natural tragedy appeal [online]. Sold at: [Accessed: twenty-five February 2010]. VAN HOEK, R. I actually. (2000) The thesis of leagility revisited. International Journal of Acuto Management Systems, 2, 196-201. VAN HOEK, R. We. (2001) The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and guidelines for analysis. Journal of Operations Managing, 19, 161-184. VAN HOEK, R. We., HARRISON, A. & CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER, M. (2001) Measuring agile capabilities inside the supply chain. International Diary of Functions & Creation Management, 21, 126-148. TRUCK WASSENHOVE, L. N. (2006) Blackett Memorial Lecture Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal Operational Research Society, 57, 475-489.