A result of Audit Thoughts and opinions on Stock Prices

 Effect of Taxation Opinion in Stock Prices Essay

EuroEconomica

Issue 2(31)/2012 ISSN: 1582-8859 Effects of Review Opinion on Stock Prices: The case of Croatia and Slovenia

Arbër H. HOTI Teaching Assistant

Faculty of Economics, University or college of Prishtina, [email protected] com

Hysen Ismajli Associate Profesor

Faculty of Economics, University or college of Prishtina, [email protected] com

Skender Ahmeti Associate Profesor

Faculty of Economics, University or college of Prishtina, skender. [email protected] com

Arben Dërmaku Assistant Profesor

Teachers of Economics, University of Prishtina, [email protected] com

Summary

The aim of this kind of paper is usually to determine the consequence of stock rates following the announcement of audited financial studies of Slovenian and Croatian public interest entities. Each of our research is to examine the importance of variables and their significance about the audit in explaining the reactions of stock cost movements (fluctuations). In this analyze we have utilized discriminant research and logit models. Discriminant analysis and logit were performed with type of view as the dependent changing and eleven financial ratios as independent variables. Evaluation results show that the review quality, the auditor's thoughts and opinions have an impact for the evolution of stock prices.

1

Keywords: Audit statement; audit opinion; stock cost; financial transactions; abnormal come back; JEL Category: M42, M40

1 . Advantages In about half of the circumstances of taxation reports you will discover notes together with the most frequent this statement. Without qualifying our opinion, all of us draw focus on: Qualified taxation reports are often issued pertaining to: scope limits, violation of GAAP (i. e. IFRS, US GAAP, IFRS pertaining to SMEs, etc), material misstatements, inadequate disclosure, change in accounting method certainly not justified, etc . There are also " modified" audit reports that warn users of particular issues. Strictly speaking these are unqualified reports, since no misstatements are diagnosed. Modified review reports are usually issued intended for: change in accounting method justified, going-concern, divided responsibility statement (more than one auditor), and justified departure by GAAP (i. e. IFRS, US GAAP, IFRS to get SMEs, etc), emphasis on a certain matter. Auditors use this report(s) to pull attention to an essential accounting issue or a great audit scope/test issue. A pending tax problem may seem like it is a disclosure issue (a contingent legal responsibility that is not likely and considerable so no official documenting is necessary but disclosure is

KNOWLEDGE IN FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING

Electronic copy sold at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2088126

EuroEconomica

Issue 2(31)/2012 ISSN: 1582-8859 necessary). In the event the statement discloses this, the audit statement need not always be altered. Nevertheless , if it is material, this could be an emphasis of the matter. In Croatia and Slovenia, the audit information are grouped as unqualified reports, matters of emphasis, with different, negative opinion, and skilled opinion. In accordance to Spathis (2003) the majority of qualifications monetary statements in Croatia and Slovenia appreciate exception while type of certification which is presented in case when the issues will be material in nature however, not fundamental disagreement or doubt. The motivation of this examine is focused within the following determinant factors with regard to Croatia and Slovenia shown companies: 1 ) The very low rate of qualified review reports (0. 69%) back in 2007 which in turn reduced to 0. 00% in 2008. It was also 0. 00% in 1998, june 2006 and 2004, 2 . The change of strictly untrained reports coming from 58. 04% in 3 years ago to 81. 36% in 2008. It had been 27. 53 in 1998, thirty eight. 42% in 2005 and 8. 4% in 2004)*, 3. The high charge of duty contingent liabilities (35. 3 1%) in the year 2007 which usually reduced to 6. 45% in 2008. It absolutely was 7. 62% in 1998, 47. 60% in 2005 and 49. 86% in 2005, 4. The rise of the rate of " going-concern opinions" from installment payments on your 79% in 2007 to five. 36% in 2008. It had been 3. 19% in june 2006 and no going-concern opinions in 2004, five. audit reviews with remarks about accounting method alterations...

References: Altman, E. (1974), Evaluation of your Company as being a Going-Concern, The Journal of Accountancy (December), pp. 50-57. Bartov, E, Gul, Farreneheit. A. and J. T. L. Tsui (2001), Discretionary-accruals Models and Audit Certification, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, pp. 421-452 Bell, Capital t. and L. Talbor (1991), Empirical Analysis of Audit Uncertainty Skills, Journal of Accounting Analysis, 29, pp. 350-370 Caramanis, C. and C. Spathis (2006), Auditee and Taxation Firm Characteristics as Determinants of Audit Qualifications: Data from the Zagreb Stock Exchange and Slovenia Stock Exchange, Managerial Auditing Journal, 21 years old, 9, pp. 905-20

KNOWLEDGE IN FUND AND ACCOUNTING

EuroEconomica

Concern 2(31)/2012 ISSN: 1582-8859 Carmichael, D. L. (1972), The Auditor is actually Reporting Accountability, Auditing Study Monograph Number 1 (New York: AICPA). Chen, T. and M. Church (1992), Default in Debt Responsibilities and the Issuance of GoingConcern Opinions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, pp. 30-49 Choi S. E. and G. C. Jeter (1992), The Effect of Competent Audit Opinion on Income Response Coefficients, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 2/3, pp. 229-247 Cormier, D. M. Magnan and B. Morard (1995), The Auditors ' Consideration with the GoingConcern Supposition: A Classification Model, Log of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Planting season, pp. 201-222 Deakin, E. B. (1977), Business Inability Prediction: An Empirical Examination in At the. I. Altman and A. W. Sametz, Eds. Economical Crises: Organizations and Marketplaces in a Delicate Environment (John Wiley & Sons), pp. 72-88 Dodd, P., Dopuch, N., R. Holthausen and R. Leftwich (1984), Competent Audit Opinions and Share Prices: Details Content, Story Dates, and Concurrent Disclosures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, (April), pp. 3-38 Dopuch, N., R. Holthausen and Ur. Leftwich (1987), Predicting Taxation Qualifications with Financial and Market Factors, The Accounting Review, 62, 3, pp. 431-454 Elliott, J. (1982), " Subject matter to" Taxation Opinions and Abnormal Security Returns: Results and Ambiguities, Journal of Accounting Study, (Autumn), pp. 617-638 Gaganis, C., F. Pasiouras and M. Doumpos (2007), Probabilistic Neural Systems for the Identification of Qualified Review Reports, Experienced Systems with Applications, thirty-two, 1, pp. 114-124 Gleason, C. A. and L. F. Mills (2002), Materiality and Conditional Tax Responsibility Reporting, The Accounting Assessment, 77, a couple of, pp. 317-342 Goodman W., D. And. Braunstein and G. W. Gregory (1995), Explaining Auditors ' GoingConcern Decisions, Record of Used Business Study, 11, three or more, pp. 82-95 Hirst, D. E. (1994), Auditor Sensitivity to Income Management, Modern day Accounting Research, 11, pp. 405-422 Hopewood, W., J. McKeow and J. Mutchler (1989), A Test with the Incremental Power of Opinions Certified for Regularity and Uncertainness, The Accounting Review, LXIV, 1, pp. 28-47 Ireland in europe, J. C. (2003), An Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Examine Reports in the UK, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30, six, pp. 975-1015 Karels, G. and A. Prakash (1987), Multivariate Normality and Foretelling of of Organization Bankruptcy, Log of Business Finance and Accounting, 16, 4, pp. 573-593 Keasey K., R. Watson and P. Wynarzcyk (1988), The Small Company Taxation Qualification: A Preliminary Investigation, Accounting and Organization Research, 18, pp. 323-333 Kida, Big t. (1980), A study Into Auditor 's Continuity and Related Qualification Judgments, Journal of Accounting Study, Autumn, pp. 506-523 Kleinman, G. and A. Anandarajan (1999), The Usefulness of Off-Balance-sheet Factors as Predictors of Auditors ' Going-Concern Opinions: An Empirical Examination, Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 6, pp. 273-285 Koh, H. C. (1991), Style Predictions and Auditor Checks of Going-Concern Status, Accounting and Organization Research, twenty one, 4, pp. 331-338

13

KNOWLEDGE IN FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING

EuroEconomica

Issue 2(31)/2012 ISSN: 1582-8859 Koh, They would. C. and L. And. Killough (1990), The Use of Multiple Discriminant Analysis in the Examination of the Going-Concern Status of an Audit Customer, Journal of Business Financing and Accounting, 17, two, pp. 179-191 Laitinen, Elizabeth. K. and T. Laitinen (1998), Certified Audit Reports in Finland: Evidence by Large Businesses, European Accounting Review, 7, 4, pp. 639-653 Even louder M. M., I. T. Khurana, R. Sawyers, C. Cordery, C. Johnson, T. Lowe and R. Wunderle (1992), The Information Content of Audit Qualifications, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, eleven, pp. 69-82 Maddala, G. S. (1991), A Point of view on the Usage of Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Parameters: Models in Accounting Analysis, The Accounting Review, 66, 4, pp. 788807 Maggina, A. (2008), On the Distributional Properties of economic Ratios in Annual Studies of Croatia and Slovenia Listed Corporations, International Diary of Bureaucratic and Economical Accounting, one particular, 2, pp. 166-183 Martens, D., D. Bruynseels, M. Baesens, Meters. Wiltekens and J. Vanthienen (2008), Predicting Going-Concern Thoughts and opinions with Info Mining, Decision Support Systems, 45, four, pp. 765-777 McKee, Big t. E. (1976), Discriminant Prediction of Going-Concern Status: An auto dvd unit for Auditors, Selected Papers of the AAA Annual Conference McKeown, J. C., L. E. Mutchler and Watts. Hopewood (1991), Towards evidence of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Opinions of Bankrupt Businesses, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, twelve, Supplement, pp. 1-13 Menon, K. and K. W. Schwartz (1987), An Empirical Investigation of Audit Degree Decisions in the Presence of Going-Concern Questions, Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring), pp. 302-315 Mutchler, T. (1985), A Multivariate Research of the Auditor 's Going-Concern Opinion Decision, Journal of Accounting Exploration, Autumn, pp. 668-682 Mutchler, J., W. Hopewood and J. McKeown (1997), The Influence of Contrary Details and Excuse Factors upon Audit Opinion Decisions about Bankrupt Corporations, Journal of Accounting Exploration, 35, pp. 295-310 Palepu, K. G. (1986), Forecasting Take-Over Objectives: A Methodological and Scientific Analysis, Diary of Accounting and Economics, pp. 3-35 Skinner, D. J. (1994), Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, pp. 38-60 Spathis, C. (2002), Discovering False Monetary Statements Employing Published Data: Some Data from Croatia and Slovenia, Managerial Auditing Journal, seventeen, 4, pp. 179191 High seasons S. L. and M. T. Sweney (1998), Fraudently Misstated Economical Statements and Insider Trading: An Scientific Analysis, The Accounting Assessment, 73, 1, pp. 131 146 Sundgren, S. (1998), Auditor Options and Auditor Reporting Methods: Evidence by Finish Tiny Firms, Western Accounting Assessment, 7, 3, pp. 441-465

14

EXPERTISE IN FINANCING AND ACCOUNTING