Of Mice and Men

 Essay about Of Rats and Guys

Curley's wife can be described as complex, key character in John Steinbeck's novella, " Of Rodents and Men" She is introduced at the beginning and ultimately triggers the end from the novella, her naivity and flirtatiousness leading to her inevitable death at the hand of Lennie, baffled and worried by her forwardness and eventual unrest.

The girl with first released by Candies, the swamper, who details her from his perpsective to George and Lennie. The fact that Curley's partner is presented through rumours means that someone already contains a biased opinion of Curley's wife ahead of she actually enters the section. Sweets mentions that she, " got the eye" detailing that the girl with flirtatious and immoral for the reason that wea re hit together with the fact that she flirts to men soon after it is stated thatshe is hitched to Curley. Already, someone is introduced to the idea that Curley's wife is usually an wrong " tart" which is heightened upon her first presence, which comes after shortly after.

he issue of sexism was very present in the 1930s compared to just how it is now. Steinbeck's use of the smoothness of Curley's Wife may be the only feminine character in the novella. Steinbeck uses different methods to minimize the importance of Curley's better half.

Steinbeck never gives Curley's Wife a name. This is certainly done to display that the girl does not possess any identity or placement on the farm. As Curley's Wife is a representation of all women in the 1930s I feel Steinbeck uses her to demonstrate that your woman does not have any identification or situation on the hacienda. As Curley's Wife is actually a representation of most women in the 1930s Personally i think Steinbeck uses her to show that most girls back then experienced no identity or placement in the working world.

Steinbeck uses methods of introduction to show the reader the hardships of girls in the 1930s. Steinbeck by no means introduces Curley's Wife over the novella. I find myself Steinbeck does this to show that although for the reader she actually is an important figure, she is minor in the thirties society. Nevertheless...